Patient’s
Perspective (introduction to UDHC through their physician or social worker):
Mr X goes to Dr A to consult him about
his 26 year old son who has recurrent bouts of unconsciousness since childhood.
Dr A listens to him and examines his son in a busy OPD for 20 minutes (which is much more than
what
he usually offers to his average patient).
Mr X feels pleased with Dr A and looks
forward to his next visit.
Once he returns home
his son
realizes he forgot to ask about the burning pain he has been experiencing
recently in his lower limbs which has been infrequent. Dr A had patiently explained
him about the headache he had been having and X was sure
his medicines would relieve the headache. He would have to wait another week or two before
he could manage to meet Dr A again in his
weekly OPD (which
would also have a long que).
There is no way he could call the
busy doctor and talk to him directly.
Dr A knows that his patients need to
be given more time to maintain an informational continuity which is so vital to
improving their health outcomes. Dr A can at best afford to give his mobile number
to patients on the condition that he cannot talk more than just a few words
which may just suffice to say that he is available at the hospital or not (on
the particular day they phone him). Even then this system is still
cumbersome for him as he (or God forbid even his-wife!) may have to take his calls
while he is driving.
The next time X visits Dr A
he is pleasantly surprised to learn from him about a
website http://care.udhc.co.in/ where he can pour in all his health
queries
which will reach him and to which he shall respond whenever he finds the time. He
shall be assisted in this posting of his problems by a UDHC social worker who
he trusts and knows well.
X
goes home and relates all his problems on a day to day
or weekly
basis (in hand written letters which he hands
over to the social worker who uploads it to the web site http://www.udhc.co.in/index.jsp
(which automatically provides him a
botanical user name to safeguard his identity and protect his privacy).
He is pleasantly surprised to find
short sympathetic and useful messages from Dr A (although they come a few days
after X's original hand written letter has been posted
to the web site).
These messages from Dr A are currently carried to him as printouts by the
social worker but Mr X and his son have been taught to also login and access
the web site ‘outputs’ and eventually they shall become self sufficient and not
have to depend completely on the social worker.
X continues to post his son’s
entire
life problems and past events that he would like to share with Dr A over the
next few weeks.
One day when the social worker shows him
the web site, X
is amazed to find that his son’s entire history (based
on the inputs he had
related slowly over the last few months) neatly structured into a story
along with all the past reports and prescriptions he had shared in the form of
a pictorial time line (see the other email attachments in word and other jpg
images as reports and prescriptions). Along with these inputs (I e history,
past reports and prescriptions) he had provided, the discussions/processing by
the UDHC team of doctors and other health professionals and their decisions/outputs
were all neatly arranged in the form of a page showing the entire input-process-outputs
around his son’s case. For similar input-process-output records click on: http://www.udhc.co.in/HOW/how.jsp
Mr
X tried to look for the discussions around the recent queries he had sent to Dr
A regarding his
on’s problem and was told that those discussions were
currently in a ‘hidden layer’ and would be released at a later date once the
UDHC team came out with a stable solution to the current problem.
Mr X found that there were no
identifying details, which he was told was per HIPAA guidelines: http://cphs.berkeley.edu/hipaa/hipaa18.html,
although he was able to identify his son’s health records himself through his
assigned ‘botanical user name’ and possibly his son or another close family
member would be able to identify it too. The website seemed to be full of
patients like him (with similar illnesses) although no one was identifiable.
They
were all named after plants and the web site shows all the patients as
thumbnails with the picture of the plants their names represent. Mr X was amused
to find that his son’s botanical user-name, Buettneria Pilosa, which
he could only pronounce with difficulty was a common creeper called ‘harjor’ in
hindi and bangle, supposedly of medicinal value in fractures. http://www.mpbd.info/plants/buettneria-pilosa.php#.T_lstoHrhH0
Mr X makes it a point to plant one of
these creepers at his home and take care of it as much as the UDHC team were
taking care of his son and nurturing his ‘health-record.’ He felt this activity
could perhaps even help him to remember that difficult to pronounce botanical
user name. He wondered what would happen if all patients started taking care of
their name-sake plants in their localities. Perhaps they needed to be careful
not to just plant one particular plant as people may start trying to identify
their health records by keeping track of which plant they particularly cared
for (or perhaps he was just being paranoid).
He found it interesting that there were
so many patients who had very similar problems as his son and they were all
visible as thumbnails on the right hand side as soon as he opened the page
showing his son’s record. He could also see many health professionals other
than Dr A who were all identifiable by their photos and CVs and registered with
this web site and whose thumbnails could be clicked upon to reveal their
details along with all the connected thumbnails of the patients they were
taking care of (which provided a good practical idea of their capacity and
expertise other than their degrees).
In
fact it sounded even more amazing that X's
son’s
story ( and other patients like him) was valuable
learning material for medical students who participated in the
further processing of these patient inputs toward optimal outputs to better
their patient’s health outcomes. These 'clinical problem-solving' exercises
by the medical students around these patients provided a formative assessment of their
learning and
helped to integrate medical education with practice.
Health professionals’ perspective:
introduction to UDHC through word of mouth from social workers, colleagues,
patients and web-browsing:
Dr
B is a primary care physician in a rural location and sees a lot of challenging
cases but has little learning feedback and support from colleagues. He is
approached by the UDHC social worker one day to join their online network
through the web site (or by patients who have already registered their health
records with us) and encouraged to post/discuss his ‘cases’ to the web site
where he is likely to get learning feedback from global health care
professionals.
As
soon as he posts his first case he finds a lot of similar cases showing up on
the right hand side, a feature loosely termed web 2.0 he is told (some of them
are from the British Medical Journal of Case Reports). He reads through those
cases and finds a lot of useful answers to his questions. A week later he has
further inputs on his case from a global network of physicians and medical
students who have processed it toward an optimal solution with evidence based
links for each decision they have suggested.
This
considerably enriches Dr B’s knowledge around the particular clinical problem
he had posted and the learning points from his case (along with the patient’s
complete thumb-nailed -health record) gets added to his online portfolio. This
not only ensures transparency in the decisions he takes around his patients but
also offers him a fair support and recognition for his solo practice in a rural
remote location.
Future
Case scenarios (Mobile Web based interactions)
One day Mr X receives an SMS which says:
AY-Guidance:
“Now receive a solution to all your
physical, mental and social problems through a friend, philosopher and
health-guide. Call toll free 5000002.”
He tries it out and as soon as he dials
the number he hears an automated but pleasant voice informing him the terms and
conditions of the ‘user driven healthcare,’ project.
Mobile
based ‘informed consent’
He is informed that his voice will be
heard and converted into text by a person working for the project who is
unlikely to recognize/identify him (although this cannot be guaranteed). It
will be further read by a panel of health professionals (including students in
training) who are unlikely to recognize/identify the patient (although this
cannot be guaranteed).
The students are going to make an
initial assessment of the patient data so that it is improved, processed
and forwarded to the panel of expert
physicians for their feedback to the patient after finalization by the panel
moderator (who is our expert Dr A) in consultation with other expert doctors in
the ‘udhc’ team.
It is possible that the initial data the
patient sends us may be inadequate, un-understandable and the patient may
receive a few queries for clarification of his initial inputs from our panel.
The panel shall try to prepare an
‘electronic health record’ of the patient based on the informational input
(both by the patient as well as the heath professional panel) and it is
possible that a proper health record may take 5 to 10 phone calls from the
patient over a period of days to weeks depending on the patient’s as well as
the healthcare panel’s involvement.
If the patient agrees to share his
health details after listening to this entire information he may consent to
talk/SMS his complaints including his entire history (as much as he can
remember/understand to the best of his capacity) by dialing another 1 digit
number.
Methodology:
Patient X agrees to the voice recorded
message and after dialing the one digit number, proceeds to talk about his
headache as much as he can think of reporting.
In his first voice post he just mentions
that he has been having headache for some time without mentioning anything else
and leaves it at that.
He gets an initial response through a
phone call in a pleasant recorded voice message that doesn’t sound automated
but X feels as if his concerns have been specifically addressed although in a
manner that requires him to answer a few more queries:
“Thanks Mr X for your query. We have
received you input and we need to know a few more things about you like:
How long have you suffered from
headaches? _____ weeks / months / years
Age at onset of headaches ________ years
old
Approximate frequency: 1x/month or
1x/week or 2-4x/week or daily
Is your headache DAILY?
If daily, how long have you had daily
headaches?
What do you do when you have a headache?
Can you continue doing what you were
doing?
Do you have to take a medication for
headache daily?
How often?
What do you take?
Does it work?
Does the headache come back?
How long have you been taking a daily
medication for your headaches?
If not daily, how many days per week do
you need to take medication for headache?
Have you noticed you have to take more
of the same medication for it to take effect?
Have you kept a diary of your headaches?
Duration of headaches: Is it brief 30-60
minutes or 1-2 hrs or 3-6 hrs or 6-24 hrs or lasts days?
Side: both sides? right side? left side?
changes sides?
Starting location: Forehead temple Top
of Head Back of Head Ear Neck Face Eye?
Overall location: Eye Forehead Temple
Top of Head, Back of head Face Ear Neck?
Quality: Pounding Boring Aching Tight
band Shooting Throbbing Pressure?
Associated complaints: Flashing Lights
Blurred Vision Dizziness Nausea Vomiting?
Have you experienced Blindness or One
Sided Paralysis or dizziness, Numbness and Confusion?
How do you identify a severe headache
starting? __________________________________
Are there warning signs before the
headache pain starts? ____________________________
Yawning?
Irritability?
Lack of concentration?
Nausea?
Flashing lights?
This has been copied by one of the UDHC
network medical students who has typed ‘headache question’ into google and reached
this site. This student uses a few questions from the available web resources
and prepares an individualized feedback and sends it back to patient X after
verifying it from the moderator who is a subject matter expert for that
particular symptomatology.
Once X’s record is created in this
manner and the subject matter expert (in this particular case Dr A) is
convinced that this is ‘Migraine’ he asks X to visit him once in his clinic
following which Dr A prescribes appropriate medicines through an E-prescription
that is SMSed to X (from Dr A’s laptop) and ‘X’ keeps taking tablet Sibelium 10
mg everyday as a migraine suppressor and sometimes takes tablet Paracetamol 1gm
for acute attacks. His initial attacks that were coming daily have improved
after 3 months and come only once in a month now which also responds well to
tablet paracetamol 1gm.
Bottom
line and plus/minuses:
This is a proposal to integrate medical
education with medical practice at the same time utilize the help and support
of a vast population of online health enthusiasts.
Case scenario 2 has a wider reach among
the population and can serve as a way to improve health professional
practitioner’s patient inflow where the patient interacts asynchronously with
the health guidance system before interacting face to face with the health
professional.
There is requirement for human
intermediaries who shall be trained in ‘online clinical problem solving’ and
this in itself can function as a ‘knowledge process outsourcing’ KPO from the
health professional practices. This activity can become an important employment
generating avenue in future.